Ref. :  000012774
Date :  2004-06-22
Language :  English
Home Page / The whole website
fr / es / de / po / en

Globalisation and Trade: How to make sure there is space for development?

Speech by Pascal Lamy, EU Trade Commissioner at Sophia University (Tokyo)

June 22, 2004

Author :  Union européenne


Thank you very much, President Currie and Professor Inoguchi, for your kind introduction. Delighted to be back in Tokyo, and even more pleased to be back at Sophia University, where I have wanted to deliver a speech ever since I joined the European Commission back in 1999. I don?t always wear my religion on my sleeve, but it is for me an important moment to come to an institution as important as Sophia, particularly when I reflect on the story of Catholicism in this extraordinary country.

If I understand rightly, Professor Inoguchi, my thanks are also due to you for letting me, basically, hijack your foreign policy class to talk about globalisation, trade and development - with one or two hundred other specially invited guests thrown in ! A few years ago, the idea of talking about globalisation in a foreign policy classroom would have course been a total aberration. Far too esoteric a subject to mess with diplomacy ! Real diplomats don?t touch trade questions. But of course, now they have to...when you stop to think about it, globalisation, trade and development are now intimately connected with foreign policy. So I make no apologies for hijacking your class. Either way, I shall be brief because this is a university and I want to hear what you think about these questions. So I trust you are armed with comments and questions. And if not, you have ? from now on - about 15 to 20 minutes to think of something.


On globalisation, I think we face a two-fold task: first, of harnessing globalisation, of using this force to produce growth and jobs, and better regulation in the name of justice. And secondly, to ensure that we also ensure that development and more specifically the interests of developing countries are fully considered.

For the fact is that globalisation currently is a two sided coin: one bright, the other excessively dark. The bright side is important. Globalisation can bring spectacular success ? like the 200 million people lifted out of poverty in China since 1990, a single fact which alone makes it possible to envisage the Millenium Development Goal of halving world poverty. But like the moon from time to time, the dark side is to the fore at present. The report by the World Commission on the Social Dimension of Globalisation reminds us that globalisation has also brought uncertainty and poverty to other regions ? the least developed countries are actually getting poorer, as their modest economic growth has failed to keep pace with population growth. And within every country, the low-skilled have lost out in the increasingly competitive labour market, while women continue to work much longer hours than men within and outside the home and are almost always paid less, and sometimes not at all. For globalisation to work, it has to be sustainable. And in order to be sustainable, it has be inclusive ? economically and socially, and in all our societies.

Quite apart from the divergences in economic reality, part of the difficulty lies in people?s perceptions. Globalisation scares people because they have the impression, and sometimes of course it is the reality - that they don?t control their own destiny. On top of which, of course, in a social or indeed a psychological sense, globalisation challenges people?s sense of identity, their sense of where they come from, their sense of who they are. And most of all, even if problems are experienced locally, they of course have global roots, and this means that we have to be able to take a global view when we turn to look for solutions.

So from an economic as well as a psychological perspective, globalisation is a real phenomenon. Over the last couple of hundred years, but with increasing velocity and indeed some would say ferocity, market capitalism has triumphed. I am not one who believes in inevitability of history. How could I say that when I am speaking in a Catholic university ! But I do believe that we have no choice in one fundamental matter, which is that we have to try to limit the potential violence of the marketplace with rules. And if you will forgive me a brief diversion in this respect, I happen to believe that it is Europe and European institutions which offer up a real global example: namely that it is possible to establish new rules, to frame the positive disciplines of the market place, to encourage economic growth but establishing limits to the market place. In summary, I am a disciple of what we call, in French, l?économie sociale de marché, or in German, die Soziale Marktwirtschaft. I am not sure there is an English translation ! Either way, it is in essence a system which puts people ahead of market numbers. The slogan is: OK for a market economy, but not a market society.

The same basic philosophy applies to the external as well as just the internal sphere. I believe in a world where we are not afraid to open markets, but where we do so with a particular focus on sustainable development, and with a particular eye on the interests of developing countries. Where rules as well as market access matter. Where regional integration counts, and developing countries are not encouraged to behave as separately floating atoms, encouraged to cut the best free trade deal that they can with the highest bidder from the north.

So that, if you like, is my analytical framework, indeed the kind of world we need to sketch out in the future: globalisation is a positive and negative force both inside our own domestic lives, and between countries. The power of the market means the positive side looks after itself. But positive action is needed to manage the darker side.

...and development

In the external sphere, this means development. For its part, the European Union is ready to push faster and further for development. We are already the largest donor of development aid, and Japan has done well here, over the years, although we need to recognise that there is a certain development fatigue here. One major advance, however, is the recognition that development cannot be separated out from trade. Just as in the 1970s and 1980s, NGOs and others realised that famine relief was not a sufficient response to the systemic problems of what we used to call the Third World, in the 1990s we realised that development had to be integrated into all our policies. In the jargon, we have to mainstream development objectives into trade, and indeed, trade objectives into development.

What has the EU done specifically, in terms of putting its money where its mouth is, as the saying goes ? I would say: ?a lot?. The EU is by far the most important single market for products from the developing countries ? we already take as much agricultural produce from the US, Japan, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand: combined. And we have now stepped forward with our idea to allow the world?s poorest 49 countries to have totally free access to the EU market, in our ?Everything But Arms? initiative, which others are now supporting, and I hope Japan will soon be one of them.

But don?t take our word for it ? check out the recent report by World Bank and IMF experts who recently produced a development report which concluded that the EU was the major economic power most open to exports from developing countries, and which has done the most to reduce our average levels of trade protection in their favour.

The multilateral dimension ? using a trade ?round? ? the Doha Development Agenda

We also have to ensure that development is at the core of our multilateral trade policy too. How ? Via a trade ?round? of negotiations. What is a trade round ? The idea goes back to the heart of the multilateral system ? namely that what you give to one country, you must also give to all. If you cut your tariffs in the WTO, you can?t, except in special circumstances, cut them for one partner, and not for others. A trade round is simply a way of bundling up a package of trade negotiations in different areas ? a mixture of tariff cuts (or ?market access?) and improved trade rules. And although you wouldn?t believe it if you read the newspapers, the multilateral system has the capacity to be an important motor for development, by ensuring firstly that the strong can?t cut out the weak, and secondly, by allowing for rules to actually favour developing countries, particularly the most vulnerable.

I still find it extraordinary that the WTO is routinely vilified as a secret or not so secret agent of globalisation, a sinister, dark organisation that works hand in glove with international multinationals to undermine democratically elected governments. The fact is that the WTO is a rather small, rather nascent island of international governance in a sea of globalisation, vulnerable to both big waves and indeed global warming.

In fact, I like to tell anti-WTO protestors that it is not that the WTO has too much power, but that it doesn?t have enough. Everyone believes, that this great GATTzilla which people love to hate, ?Geneva?s mistake by the lake?, is so powerful...but in fact it actually has only around one quarter the staff of the OECD. An organisation so ?ruthless? in its execution of global rules that the Director General has no power of initiative, no power to make a proposal to the 148 Members. Indeed, and it is another separate debate, that is why many of us also believe that the WTO needs fundamental reform, at the right moment, to make it a more effective organisation simply in terms of efficiency of purpose.

So indeed the European Union was to the forefront of hose who fought very hard to ensure that our current Round is not just a conventional trade negotiation, where everyone tries to get the most for himself, and does as little as possible for anyone else. That is why we supported the idea of calling the current Round of negotiations, the ?Doha Development Agenda?, Doha being the place where we launched the Round back in 2001. But as the name implies, the intention is to ensure that development is right at the forefront.

So let me briefly retrace my steps. Globalisation is a problem as well as a benefit, and which requires more attention to development. But development implies greater attention to trade, and to multilateral trade in particular ? and the best current vehicle for pushing multilateral trade in the interests of developing countries is the Doha Development Agenda, or DDA.

And what is happening right now on the DDA ? Well, we launched it in 2001, with the hope of concluding it in 2004. I fear, since the disastrous Cancun meeting, that that is not going to happen, but we and others are fighting hard to get the round back on track, and the EU in particular is making some very concrete moves on agriculture and development.


Let me start with agriculture. We in the EU, like in Japan, make no apology for having an agricultural policy. Agriculture is not like coal, or widgets. It concerns the protection, preservation and promotion of a traditional rural way of life, of a unique landscape, indeed landscapes in both societies.

There is nothing wrong with that ? agricultural life has a right to be looked after, whether it is in Europe, India, Japan, or the US. And the US, for example, despite having bigger, more competitive farms, throws just as much subsidy, as a percentage of GNP, at its agriculture as we do. But at the same time, agriculture is of course a hot issue for developing countries who feel ? and they are right, by the way ? that the rich countries spend too much money supporting their agriculture in trade distorting ways, and to their detriment.

So the question becomes: not whether we should have a public policy to support agriculture, or not, but how we can make it less trade distorting. We in Europe, we are often the most criticised, but we have made clear that we were ready to do a lot to reduce domestic support of agriculture, particularly the most trade distorting kinds; ready to do more to open our markets, and ready to tackle one of the most controversial subjects of all ? export subsidies. Already export subsidies are now two thirds lower than in 1992, and last year, we offered to eliminate them on a list of products of interest to developing countries.

That was last year. Before a singularly disastrous Ministerial meeting of the WTO held in Cancun, where we basically flopped, and failed to meet our objectives to reach the mid-way point of the Round. And why ? There are many ideas, but essentially, it was developing country unease, and especially from the poorest countries who coalesced in a group called the G90. So we have once again returned to the drawing board, making clear that we are ready to go further still on the question of export subsidies, if there is equivalent action from the other rich countries, such as the US, Canada, Australia, on their own means of subsidising exports. Just this one example shows that Europe is serious about opening up markets in agriculture, particularly for poor countries, even if the rest of the world continues to believe that this an area where European protection will be absolute and eternal.

And development again...

But the other example from the DDA I want to give you is of the overall importance we and others attach to development issues per se in the Round. Some clearly feel that by calling this Round the Development Agenda, it was if we tried or were trying to co-opt developing country support for the Round by pretending it is not about difficult policy choices in opening markets, putting together complex new rules, but really just about development. Of course, the Round won?t succeed, won?t be seen to have succeeded, if it doesn?t manage to integrate developing countries better into the world economy. That is a cornerstone policy for us, including outside the WTO context, as I have said already.

But at the same time, remember why the Cancun meeting failed last year: poor countries? anxiety and frustration. They had the sense that they had the least to gain and the most to lose from the Round. So to be very frank, we have been looking for ways to reassure this group of countries, essentially the G90, that the Round will not be a burden for them.

Who are these most vulnerable countries ? There are many ways you can assess who they are. But my own best proxy, having flown around the world for the last five years and discussed these issues back and forth with Ministers from more than a hundred WTO countries, is lack of negotiating capacity. India and China have many poor people, but they have plenty of resources, plenty of know-how, to defend their corner in international trade neogtiations. Hence their ability to lift so many out of poverty. So does Brazil. So does India. Ethiopia, Chad, Laos, do not.

So I have in recent weeks used the slogan, including in this letter we have sent to all Trade ministers, of the ?Round for Free?. Perhaps that it is too politically incorrect for some. But we do believe that we should offer the Round at a sharply discounted price, to use some good globalisation rhetoric, to the poorer, more vulnerable countries on this planet. We should offer them this reassurance for a whole host of reasons ? because it?s the right thing to do, and it is also the most practical thing to do. There?s no point negotiating for years with countries who don?t have the capacity to implement what is agreed, and where ? just to get the deal done at the end ? we agree to give lengthy derogations or carve-outs from obligations. While it would be classic trade negotiating strategy to make a grandiose offer of this kind only in the closing days of the Round, I think that would be too late. We need the proactive involvement of these countries now and we will only get that by delivering reassurances now.

So where are we now ? The current signs are relatively good. I have said before that trade talks are like volcanoes, with three modes: sleeping, smoking and erupting. The last few weeks have convinced me that that the Round is now ?smoking? rather actively, and the stage is set for a decent eruption in July, where we hope to tie down modalities for the rest of the negotiations. That would take us around 50% of the way along to completion of the Round. This would be satisfying in lots of ways, not least to show people that conventional wisdom ? in this case, that there will be no movement in 2004 ? can be profoundly wrong.


Let me conclude before opening the floor for debate. I wanted to show you today that the WTO and the Doha negotiations can be an effective tool in harnessing globalisation in the interests of all, and combatting the darker side of the moon...and that agricultural negotiations don?t have to be about giving up legitimate communal interests to preserve a way of life in Europe and Japan and elsewhere. But they do need to be about focusing on the interests of the poorest countries in the globe, and about tackling the market distortions in the north which work against developing country interests.

I make no apology for descending today into the details of the trade negotiation. I know that a university audience wants some technical details, and not just generalities about trade and development, and I wanted to give you a concrete explanation about how development and trade have to work hand in hand in practice. And I wanted to show you how the round can advance the cause of development and of developing countries, ensuring that their voice is heard for the first time properly in a global forum, and indeed translating words into action...

Thank you very much

Rate this content
Average of 37 ratings 
Rating 2.57 / 4 MoyenMoyenMoyenMoyen
Same author:
 flecheMinimum wages in the EU in January 2007
 flecheThe Court of First Instance annuls the decision authorising the creation of Sony BMG
 flecheCommission proposes practical improvements to the way the European GMO legislative framework is implemented
 flecheEconomic Partnership Agreements (EPAs) with ACP countries
 flecheBarcelona Declaration and Euro-Mediterranean partnership
 flecheEU Trade Commissioner Peter Mandelson to meet Malinese President Toumani Toure; will recall EU Doha commitments on cotton trade
 flecheCommission provides an additional €4 M to victims of tropical storm Stan in El Salvador and Guatemala
 flecheHumanitarian aid: Commission allocates € 6 million for victims of the conflict in Nepal and for Bhutanese refugees
 flecheUnemployment rates of the total population by level of education (EU 25)
 flecheEU25 : Convergence and Competitiveness Objectives 2007-2013 (draft)
 flecheLa recherche à pas de géant
 fleche Un avenir européen pour le Kosovo
 flecheMobiliser les cerveaux européens: permettre aux universités de contribuer pleinement à la stratégie de Lisbonne
 flecheL'Institut universitaire européen de Florence propose un nouveau programme postdoctoral en sciences sociales
 flecheZimbabwe: Commission allocates €15 million in humanitarian aid to vulnerable groups
 flecheWhat is a researcher? European Commission defines roles and responsibilities
 flecheAvian Influenza: Commission proposes updated measures aimed at preventing epidemics
 flecheEuropeans want policy makers to consider the environment as important as economic and social policies
 flecheStatement by the President of the European Commission, José Manuel Barroso, to mark the first anniversary of enlargement, 1 May 2005
 flecheHow does the European Commission deal with ethical issues within its Framework Programme for Research and Development
 flecheDirective du Parlement Européen et du Conseil relative aux services dans le marché intérieur
 flecheInformation note of the European Court of Auditors on Special Report No 10/2004 concerning the audit of Devolution of EC external aid management to the Commission Delegations [1]
 flecheLessons from Spain: more focus on young voters needed and people should be informed to become convinced. Results of a post-referendum Eurobarometer in Spain
 flecheFree movement of goods: too many infringements are hampering economic growth
 flechePosting of workers: the Commission asks Greece and the Netherlands to end unjustified restrictions
 flecheEU research maximises regional dynamics, boosts competitiveness for EU SMEs
 flecheEuropean Commission welcomes G8 commitment to put Africa and Development high on its agenda
 flecheCustoms: Commission proposes strategy for simplified rules of origin
 flecheEurope's population is getting older. How will this affect us and what should we do about it?
 flecheLisbon strategy can make a significant contribution to growth, a Commission report shows
 flecheTreaty establishing a Constitution for Europe
 flecheCompetitiveness Council backs Commission “partnership for growth and jobs”
 flecheGender Mainstreaming in EU policies
 flecheEuropean Neighbourhood Policy: the next steps
 flecheDoha Round: EU Commissioners Mandelson and Fischer Boel travel to Kenya for multilateral trade talks
 flecheEuropean research infrastructures: a means to boost knowledge and fuel growth
 flecheMergers: Commission approves acquisition of Shell Gas by Repsol Butano
 flecheConférence sur la politique européenne de développement
 flecheCommission adopts favourable opinion on the accession of Bulgaria and Romania
 flecheEuropean researchers based in the US want more contact with Europe
 flecheThe Commission adopts a new Drugs Action Plan for 2005-2008
 flecheLes chercheurs européens établis aux États-Unis veulent un renforcement des contacts avec l’Europe
 flecheA reinforced transatlantic dialogue will be beneficial to the rest of the world
 flecheEuropean Commission accelerates preferential trade measures to benefit tsunami-hit countries
 flecheEU Trade Commissioner proposes trade measures to complement G8 push on debt, aid and development
 flecheEU launches new export help service for developing countries
 flecheSpecial ASEAN Summit
 flecheCommission sharpens fight against cross-border crime in the EU
 flecheEurobarometer on Constitution: a positive attitude, but a lack of information
 flecheLatest European regional statistics confirm Commission’s proposal on Structural Funds for 2007-2013
 flecheSurvey shows European public is largely at ease with euro three years after adoption
 flecheDeclaration by the Presidency on behalf of the European Union on Sudan – Signing of the comprehensive peace agreement on 9 January 2005 in Nairobi
 fleche “Mental illness is Europe’s unseen killer” says Markos Kyprianou
 flecheFrance: Commission pursues legal action for failures to respect six environment rulings of the European Court of Justice
 flecheNovember 2004: Euro-zone and EU25 unemployment stable at 8.9%
 flecheCommission’s report indicates that governments should do more to implement energy market opening measures
 flecheOctober 2004: Euro-zone external trade surplus 5.5 bn euro
 flecheBrussels European Council: Presidency conclusions
 flecheEIB AND Inter-American Development Bank sign memorandum of understanding
 flecheCommission launches public consultation on future programme for active citizenship
 flecheProtecting Europe from epidemics: Director named for new EU health agency
 fleche"EU and Turkey on the threshold of a new phase"
 flecheGreat Lakes Region - Humanitarian Situation
 flecheEurobarometer: marked improvement in perception of the European Union and what it does
 flecheBarcelona hosts the Festival of European Cinema, with the support of the MEDIA programme
 flecheEU equips parents with internet safety tools
 flecheEuropean Neighbourhood Policy: the first Action Plans
 flecheNature protection: Commission establishes largest ever list of protected areas in the EU
 flecheEU - China Summit : China now second trade partner of EU25
 flecheUN conference on climate change: EU set to keep momentum in the global fight against climate change
 flecheCommission consults public on action plan to reduce air pollution
 flecheFull text of the Constitution
 flecheEuropean Constitution : Procedures planned for the ratification
 flecheThe European Union and Emerging World Orders: Perceptions and Strategies - speech of Ján Figel, Commissioner for Education, Training, Culture and Multilingualism
 flecheChemical Pollution: EU ratifies Stockholm POP Convention
 flecheCitizens make increasing use of the European Ombudsman
 flecheUNESCO negotiations on cultural diversity: the Commission obtains a mandate from the Council
 flecheEU strategy to enforce Intellectual Property Rights in third countries - facts and figures
 flecheEuropean Council - Conclusions
 flecheReport from the Commission to the Spring European Council: Delivering Lisbon - reforms for the enlarged Union
 flecheEU Presidency Statement - Migration issues
 flecheAccess to medicines: Commission proposes to allow export of generic medicines to poor countries
 flecheFourth Report on Citizenship of the Union
 flecheQuestions & Answers: The entry into force of the Kyoto Protocol
 flecheThe European Anthem
 flecheDeveloping countries: facts and figures on the new EU scheme of trade preferences for 2006-2008
 flecheEU-ACP: EU, Commonwealth and Francophonie join hands in supporting ACP trade policy makers
 flecheYoung people and drugs: changing attitudes in the Member States since 2002
 fleche"The European Ombudsman: Could he help you?" : now available in 21 languages
 flecheWTO-Vietnam: EU and Vietnam conclude bilateral deal for Vietnam's accession to WTO
 flecheUS-Boeing: EU takes US to the WTO over subsidies granted to Boeing
 flecheASEM 5 Summit in Hanoi, Vietnam, 7-9th October 2004
 flecheEU-Mercosur: EU presents its completed offer to Mercosur in on-going trade talks
 flecheLIFE+: Commission proposes new streamlined funding programme for the environment
 flecheEU-Mercosur: EU presents its completed offer to Mercosur in on-going trade talks
 flecheRomano Prodi, President of the European Commission, Conference on EMU and economic governance - Closing address
 flecheRecommandation from the Commission to the Council to authorise the Commission to participate, on behalf of the Community, in the
negotiations within UNESCO on the convention on the protection of the diversity of cultural contents and artistic expressions.

 flecheEU can and must boost employment with the right policies
 flecheFor a more effective involvement of civil society in world trade talks
 flecheErasmus Mundus: 82 European universities launch programme
 flecheTrade and Development: success stories in EU trade-related assistance
 flecheGlobal efforts for the environment: Commission and UNEP to reinforce co-operation
 flecheCommission moves smartly to launch European Mobility Week
 flecheCommission launches stakeholder consultation on future climate change policy
 flecheJoining forces to alleviate poverty and hunger in developing countries
 flecheLabour Force Survey – 2003. Employment rate in the EU25 in 2003
 flecheEU-Pacific Trade: facts and figures
 flecheEU-ASEAN: Trade and Investment initiative makes headway
 flecheThe European Commission confirms the need for a Community regulatory framework for nuclear safety and radioactive waste management
 fleche'For Diversity. Against Discrimination' truck tour to help the drive against discrimination in the EU
 flecheUS Byrd Amendment – WTO says eight WTO Members may retaliate against the US – Joint Press statement by Brazil, Canada, Chile, the EU, India, Japan, Korea, and Mexico
 flecheEuropean demography in 2003 : EU25 population up by 0.4% to reach 456 million. One in 14 people in world live in the EU25

 flecheDarfur crisis: Commission releases a further 20 million euros in humanitarian aid
 flecheThe "Europass Training"
 flecheImplementation of EU environmental law: survey highlights serious shortcomings
 flecheLife expectancy in the member states of the European Union
 flecheEnlargement Day Celebrations - 25 Members of the EU at Farmleigh,Dublin
 flecheFurther European Union Support for the Presidential Elections in Afghanistan
 flecheSigning the Nice Treaty (February 26, 2001)
 flecheSolana, Javier
 fleche"Television without Frontiers"
 flecheLa politique de recherche et l'espace dans le Traité constitutionnel
 flecheWTO: EU committed to progress in WTO negotiations
 flecheEU INSPIREs better geographical info
 flecheFourth Euromed Trade Ministerial:
towards an integrated Euro-Mediterranean market

 flecheEmployment and poverty reduction in developing countries
 flecheCommission strengthens cohesion policy in the enlarged European Union
 flecheThe Commission proposes new Education, MEDIA, Culture and Youth programmes for 2007-2013
 flecheSudan/Chad: Commission earmarks further 18 million euros for victims of Darfur crisis
 fleche"1000 discussions for Europe" on the new Constitution
 flecheProtection de la couche d'ozone : la Commission intente une action contre neuf États membres
 flecheEU action against HIV/AIDS
 flecheDeveloping countries: Commission unveils system of trade preferences for next ten years - simple, transparent and objective
 flecheLe Prix Prince des Asturies « Coopération internationale » attribué au programme Erasmus
 flecheEU-Africa Cotton Forum: Pascal Lamy proposes a joint strategy for African countries
 flecheHealth in developing countries - Commission and World Health Organization join forces to deliver on development goals

 flecheRoadmap for EU-U.S. Regulatory Cooperation and Transparency
 flecheMobility of researchers: the EU proposes new prospects and opportunities
 flecheDeclaration by the Presidency on behalf of the European Union on the situation in Darfur, western Sudan
 flecheEU EPICA research project: solving the climate change puzzle?
 flecheMap showing the use of the euro
 flecheUnião Européia
 flecheBalkans occidentaux: lancement des premiers partenariats européens

 flecheEU citizens in favour of a common asylum and immigration policy
 flecheEU Strategy Against Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction
 flecheBrussels European Council: PRESIDENCY CONCLUSIONS
 flecheSeptember 2003 Euro-zone unemployment stable at 8.8%
 flecheEU-ACPs: opening of trade negotiations with West and Central Africa
 flecheDraft Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe
 flecheThe full text of the draft Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe
 flecheEuropean Commission regrets US decision to file WTO case on GMOs as misguided and unnecessary
 flecheAthens Declaration
 flechePremier Forum des Parlementaires Africains pour le Nouveau Partenariat pour l'Afrique (NEPAD)
 flecheL' "Amendement Byrd" en infraction avec les règles de l'OMC
 flecheEuropean Union launches coalition of like-minded states to deliver World Summit renewable energy goals
Keywords   go
Translate this page Traduire par Google Translate

Share on Facebook
Partager sur Twitter
Share on Google+Google + Share on LinkedInLinkedIn
Partager sur MessengerMessenger Partager sur BloggerBlogger
Other items
where is published this article: