Ref. :  000041026
Date :  2017-03-09
Language :  English
Home Page / The whole website
fr / es / de / po / en

Brazil: Military Police Muzzled

Laws Used to Suppress Calls for Police Reform

Author :  Human Rights Watch

Brazilian authorities should reform laws that have been used to impose disproportionate punishments on military police officers who speak out publicly to advocate reform or voice complaints, Human Rights Watch said today.

“A country with close to 60,000 killings a year urgently needs to consider new approaches to public security,” said Maria Laura Canineu, Brazil director at Human Rights Watch. “Those who fight crime every day on the streets have an invaluable perspective on security policy and police reform; and should be able to express their views without fear of being punished arbitrarily.”

Brazil’s 436,000 military police officers patrol the country’s streets, a purely civilian task, but are subject to military law because they are technically considered to be auxiliary forces of the Army. Brazil’s military criminal code and various state disciplinary codes include broad restrictions on the officers’ free speech rights.

Brazilian authorities should reform laws that have been used to impose disproportionate punishments on military police officers who speak out publicly to advocate reform or voice complaints. Brazil’s 436,000 military police officers patrol the country’s streets, a purely civilian task, but are subject to military law because they are technically considered to be auxiliary forces of the Army. Brazil’s military criminal code and various state disciplinary codes include broad restrictions on the officers’ free speech rights.

Police officers who transgress these limits can end up in prison under the military criminal code. Police commanders also have wide discretion to impose harsh penalties under the disciplinary codes. Under article 166 of the military criminal code, criticizing a superior officer or a government decision are crimes punishable with up to a year in prison. Inciting “indiscipline” is punishable with up to four years under article 155. State disciplinary codes that govern the conduct of military police officers, both on duty and off duty, and of retired military police officers contain similar infractions, punishable with up to 30 days in detention and expulsion from the force. These offenses are so broadly framed that they allow for harsh punishment out of all proportion to the severity of the offense, and in some cases this is precisely what happens.

International human rights law allows countries considerable – though limited – discretion to limit the free expression rights of security force personnel. It does not, however, allow authorities to impose punishments that are disproportionate to the severity of any offense.

Darlan Abrantes, a military police officer in the state of Ceará, was sentenced to two years in prison in July 2016 after he self-published a book saying that the police force should be demilitarized. The sentence was suspended, but he had already been expelled from the force in 2014 in connection with the matter, destroying his career. Police officers also told Human Rights Watch that they had been subject to arbitrary punishments in retaliation for speaking out in ways that angered superiors, without access to any effective remedy.

Brazilian authorities should reform laws to ensure that any punishments meted out to military police officers who transgress legal restrictions on their right to free expression are proportionate to the severity of any offense, Human Rights Watch said. They should ensure that all officers have access to an effective and impartial appeals process.

The authorities should also consider whether it is necessary and appropriate for police officers to be subject to the limits on free expression imposed under the military criminal code and state disciplinary codes, or whether a less restrictive legal framework is called for under international and regional human rights law.


Former military police officer Abrantes holds his book. © Cesar Munoz/HRW 2016

Several reform efforts are under way that could achieve that purpose, and result in more accountable and effective policing. They include bills in Congress to delink the military police from the army and to abolish administrative detention, as well as proposals at the state level to reform disciplinary codes.

The unreasonably harsh punishments handed down to some police officers have a dramatic chilling effect on other members of the force, who often refrain from expressing opinions or suggestions about law enforcement reform for fear of reprisals, said Human Rights Watch.

“Officers can be imprisoned and their careers destroyed for expressing opinions about police reform that their commanders don’t like,” said Canineu. “These penalties are out of all proportion to whatever interest the government has in limiting their ability to speak out.”

Detailed Analysis

Darlan Abrantes, a military police officer in the state of Ceará, self-published Militarism--An Archaic Security System, in 2008, printing 300 copies. In the book, Abrantes asserts that Brazil has a “medieval” police system in which low-ranking police officers “are not allowed to think for themselves.” They are supposed to simply follow orders and if they criticize militarism they are detained, he wrote. Abrantes contends that transforming the military police into a civil police force would make it more efficient in fighting crime and would bring it closer to the population.

The Ceará state command expelled Abrantes from the force in 2014, under article 24 of the state’s disciplinary statute, concluding that the book contained “serious offenses” and that, in publishing it, Abrantes had demonstrated “absolute lack of discipline and insubordination.” At that time, his police record was “excellent,” Abrantes told Human Rights Watch.

A military court – made up of four high-ranking officers and a judge – sentenced Abrantes, in July 2016, to two years in prison, under article 155 of the military criminal code, for “inciting to disobedience, indiscipline or the practice of a military crime.” The prosecutor accused Abrantes of handing out his book in the police academy, which he denies.

The military criminal code does not define what actions may be considered to constitute incitement to disobedience, indiscipline, or the practice of a military crime. This gives military prosecutors ample leeway to criminalize the expression of opinions that are critical of the police command.

In Abrantes’ case, the judge imposed a suspended sentence, under which he will not spend time in prison as long as he complies with five probation conditions: not committing another crime, not drinking alcohol, not going into gambling locations, not carrying firearms or thrusting weapons, and appearing before the court once a month.

“They considered me a criminal because I dared to think differently – I dared to say that the military system is not working,” Abrantes told Human Rights Watch. “I am living proof that the military police do not respect either democracy or freedom of expression.”

Abrantes’ call for “demilitarization” is far from the fringe. More than 76 percent of military police officers polled nationwide in 2014 said that state military police forces should abandon their military structure and subordination to the army. Their link to the military, as auxiliary forces, subjects them to the military criminal code that was adopted during Brazil’s military dictatorship (1964-1985).

This issue is an important area of public debate that could have important human rights implications, given the prevalence of police abuses in Brazil. Some high-ranking and low-ranking police officers interviewed by Human Rights Watch criticized military training and structure. In their view, the military nature of the police forces perpetuates a vision of officers as heroes fighting an enemy – suspected criminals – that can lead to excessive use of force, especially in poor neighborhoods, and to high levels of stress among officers. Instead, police should focus on preventing crime and use lethal force only when strictly unavoidable to protect life.

State disciplinary codes, some of which also date to the dictatorship, likewise contain broad restrictions on free speech and allow for disproportionate penalties for both active and retired military police officers.

The code of the state of São Paulo, for example, prohibits publishing or spreading information that may “discredit” the military police or harm hierarchy or discipline, without any further definition of what kinds of information may cause those effects.

The disciplinary codes of São Paulo and 14 other states also contain the same prohibition – not allowing officers “to discuss or incite the discussion, through any communications media, of political, military or military police matters, except for those exclusively technical when duly authorized.” This can be interpreted to subject military police officers to punishment for any public statement about policing or public security.

Many state disciplinary statutes also confer commanders the authority to determine the gravity of the administrative infraction, which gives them broad discretion to impose harsh or disproportionate punishment. Sanctions include up to 30 days in detention in the barracks or expulsion from the force.

One such case involves Pará state military police officer Luiz Fernando Passinho. Every year, on Brazilian Independence Day, nationwide demonstrations celebrate “The Shout of the Excluded,” in which people protest against social exclusion. Passinho took a microphone during such a demonstration on September 7, 2014, and in a two-minute speech, complained that military police officers and military firefighters are told during training that they have no rights. “That message distorts the nature of our mission, our sense of citizenship, and has a direct effect on our relationship to the community,” said Passinho, who was not in uniform. “We cannot accept that our freedom of expression should be considered a crime.”

The general commander of the Pará State military police decided that Passinho’s speech had “violated discipline and military hierarchy,” caused “disorder” within the force, and damaged the reputation of its command. The commander accused Passinho of having failed to exhibit a long list of values that every military police officer is required to respect, under articles 17 and 18 of the disciplinary statute of the state of Pará, including “professionalism,” “loyalty,” and “discipline.” The commander said Passinho had violated nine prohibitions, under article 37, including by exhibiting “inappropriate behavior in public” and by publishing information that could “discredit the force or harm discipline.” The commander ordered Passinho detained for 30 days in October 2016. Passinho has appealed the decision to the same commander who issued it, as the procedure in the state´s disciplinary code establishes.

Meanwhile, the command is persecuting him for speaking out, he told Human Rights Watch. In September, for example, the command ordered him detained for 15 days for a single instance of not wearing his hat while in uniform, he said, an infraction usually punished with a warning.

“The military command uses the disciplinary statute arbitrarily,” Passinho said. “Police officers who commit real crimes escape punishment.”

Dozens of low-ranking officers in Rio de Janeiro interviewed by Human Rights Watch in 2015 and 2016 said they were afraid of being punished for expressing opinions. Almost all requested that their names not be published, for fear of reprisal, though the state military command had given Human Rights Watch written authorization to conduct the research.

Restrictions on free speech also stifle internal debate. A nationwide study published in 2016 by Brazil's federal government concluded that low-ranking officers believe they are rarely allowed to express an opinion different from that of a superior officer at work. They were frequently afraid to do so. More than 14,000 low-ranking military police officers participated in the study.


Many police officers are afraid not only of formal disciplinary action, but of broader retaliation they may face for speaking out. Leandro Bispo, a police officer in Pára State, faced disciplinary action in 2012, 2013, and 2014 in connection with three Facebook posts he wrote or shared. One said that police have inadequate working conditions. Another alleged corruption and abuse within the police. A third offered scathing criticism of public institutions in Brazil without mentioning the police by name.

The disciplinary proceedings against Bispo resulted in his demotion from corporal to soldier in 2016 and required him to return six months’ worth of a salary increase that he had already received, he told Human Rights Watch. He also said there had been informal retaliation against him, for which he had no effective recourse. His commander transferred him to the city of Porto de Moz, four hours away by car and speedboat from his home, which he believed was in response to the comments he wrote or shared on Facebook. When Bispo filed a petition to contest the transfer, he faced yet another disciplinary proceeding, in which the commander contended that Bispo had wrongly accused him of violating internal regulations.

In December, Bispo was expelled from the force altogether for various violations of the state disciplinary statute, including requirements to revere the symbols and traditions of the military police, to respect discipline and to avoid “inconvenient” comments about the police, discrediting a superior officer, and making anonymous comments. Bispo plans to appeal to a civil court.

Bispo, who has a daughter and a pregnant wife, borrowed money from his mother-in-law to make a down payment on the lawyer´s fees and needs to pay the rest in monthly installments. He said that losing his job in a time of economic crisis in Brazil is adding to the stress of the situation.

Brazil’s Federal Government issued recommendations in 2010 urging states to reform laws and disciplinary codes to respect the rights contemplated in the country’s Constitution. The recommendations called on states not only to guarantee the rights of police officers to free speech, especially over the internet, but to encourage their participation in public fora and initiatives, such as seminars, councils, research projects, and conferences, where public security policies “are debated, publicized, studied, reflected on and formulated.” Implementation of the recommendations, however, has been disappointing.

Human Rights Framework

Under international human rights law, the right to free expression can be limited by law only to the extent necessary for respect of the rights and reputations of others, or to protect national security, public order, public health or morals. This framework is applicable under both the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the American Convention on Human Rights. Brazil is a state party to both.

In cases in 2005 and in 2009, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights found that government efforts to curtail the speech of former military officers were unlawful restrictions on their rights. However, it is generally accepted that governments have much broader leeway than in other contexts to restrict the free expression rights of security force personnel if considered necessary to protect national security or public order. This reflects, among other things, a recognition of the state’s legitimate interests in maintaining discipline and hierarchy within the ranks and ensuring that the police and military as institutions are not politicized.

This does not, however, obviate governments’ responsibility to ensure that restrictions on the free expression of security force members are in fact “necessary” to protect national security and public order, and no more restrictive than necessary to achieve those aims. As the special rapporteur for freedom of expression of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights stated in 2009, members of the armed forces are “entitled to freedom of expression and are legitimately able to exercise this right, and the limits imposed upon them must be respectful of the conditions established in the American Convention.” Limitations to that right “can be neither excessive nor unnecessary, and they must in every case meet the requirements set forth in article 13.2 of the Convention.”

In December 2016, a second-instance civil judge in the state of Rio Grande do Norte ordered an end to disciplinary proceedings against an active-duty military police officer, João Figueiredo, whom the state military police command had ordered detained for 15 days for “offending” the force in a comment he posted online. The judge issued her ruling on the basis of “the violation of the defendant’s human rights, the violation of the Constitution regarding freedom of expression and thought, and also because of the legal flaws in the proceedings, the very clear restrictions placed upon the defense by the authority, and the disproportionality of the punishment.” The military police command did not appeal the decision.

Even where laws that restrict the right to free expression are acceptable, the punishments must be proportionate to the seriousness of the offense.

Countries : 
- Brazil   

Rate this content
Same author:
 flecheLa Turquie n’enregistre plus les demandeurs d’asile syriens
 flecheTurkmenistan: Report of inquiry to German cybersecurity firm
 flecheUkraine: investigate, punish hate crimes
 flecheKids with albinism belong at home and in school
 flecheAfghanistan: World Bank should aid girls’ education
 flecheRussia: Repression, Discrimination Ahead of World Cup
 flecheSaudi Arabia: Thousands Held Arbitrarily
 flecheNicaragua: Protests Leave Deadly Toll
 flecheZimbabwe: Tobacco Work Harming Children
 flecheRwanda: Unlawful Military Detention, Torture
 flecheForced Labor Used in Uzbekistan's Cotton Harvests
 flecheIran: Women Face Bias in the Workplace
 flecheUS: Policy failures drive preventable overdose deaths
 flecheFollow the Thread
 flecheWorld Report 2017: Demagogues Threaten Human Rights
 flecheHalte à l’utilisation d’écoles à des fins militaires
 flecheKenya: Involuntary Refugee Returns to Somalia
 flecheAustralia: Appaling abuse, neglect of refugees on Nauru
 flecheHazardous Child Labor on Indonesian Tobacco Farms
 flecheGlobal Profits from Hazardous Child Labor
 flechePeople with Disabilities at Risk in Conflict, Disaster
 flecheTunisia: Uphold Rights While Fighting Terrorism
 flecheUS: Abuse of Transgender Women in Immigration Detention
 flecheBusinesses Help Fuel Abuses in Israeli Settlements
 flecheKiller Robots and the Concept of Meaningful Human Control
 flecheEU/Balkans/Greece: Border Curbs Threaten Rights
 fleche“Stay With Him Even If He Wants To Kill You”
 flecheSouth Sudan's Schools Occupied by Military
 flecheRights in Transition
 fleche‘Politics of Fear’ Threatens Rights : World Report 2016
 flecheLebanon: Residency Rules Put Syrians at Risk
 flecheRwanda: International Tribunal Closing Its Doors
 flecheSouth Sudan: Terrifying Lives of Child Soldiers
 flecheHuman Rights in Climate Pact Under Fire
 flecheChild Marriage: Zimbabwe
 flecheUN: Human Rights Crucial in Addressing Climate Change
 flecheAmid Insecurity, Protect Refugees
 flecheEU/AU: Put Rights at Heart of Migration Efforts
 flecheUN: End Overbroad Foreign Terrorist Fighter Laws
 flecheEU/Balkans: Contradictory Migration Plan
 flecheKenya: Climate Change Threatens Rights
 flecheSyria: New Russian-Made Cluster Munition Reported
 flecheEU: Shifting Responsibility on Refugees, Asylum Seekers
 flecheEU: Leaders Duck Responsibilities on Refugees
 flecheDispatches: France – State Snooping is Now Legal
 flecheCluster Munitions Used in 5 Countries in 2015
 flecheChina: Ensure 2022 Olympics Won’t Fuel Abuse
 flecheDispatches: The EU, Migration, and Learning to Share
 flecheChina/Kazakhstan: 2022 Games Major Test of Olympic Reforms
 flecheUN: Act to Empower Women in Conflicts
 flecheWestern Balkans: Media Freedom Under Threat
 flecheYemen: Unlawful Airstrikes Kill Dozens of Civilians
 flecheEU: Rights Abuses at Home Drive Mediterranean Crisis
 fleche37 Countries Start Process of Protecting Schools and Universities During Conflict
 flecheThe ‘Killer Robots’ Accountability Gap
 flecheUN: Major Step on Internet Privacy
 flecheSyria: 83% of Lights Extinguished After 4 Years of Crisis
 flecheWorld Report 2015: Rights Aren’t Wrong in Tough Times
 flecheTunisia: Blogger Convicted by Military Court
 flecheTunisia: Four Years On, Injustice Prevails
 flecheSouth Sudan: One Year Later, Injustice Prevails
 flecheIndia: Women With Disabilities Locked Away and Abused
 flecheUS: Senate Report Slams CIA Torture, Lies
 flecheUS: Immigration Plan Laudable But Incomplete
 flecheThe silence over Islamic State’s abuse of women
 flecheCrimea: Human Rights in Decline
 flecheUkraine, Syria: Incendiary Weapons Threaten Civilians
 flecheSyria: ISIS Tortured Kobani Child Hostages
 flecheIraq: ISIS Executed Hundreds of Prison Inmates
 flecheUS: Migrants Returned to Danger
 flecheNigeria: Victims of Abductions Tell Their Stories
 flecheEurope: National Courts Extend Reach of Justice
 flecheÉtats-Unis : Dérives de la surveillance
 flecheIraq: ISIS Abducting, Killing, Expelling Minorities
 flecheUnited Nations: Rein in Mass Surveillance
 flecheUganda: Homeless Children Face Violence, Exploitation
 flecheFrance: Face-Veil Ruling Undermines Rights
 flecheIsrael: Serious Violations in West Bank Operations
 flecheTo Help Restore Confidence in Europe, Protect Rights
 flecheSyria: Abuses in Kurdish-run Enclaves
 flecheMalaysia: End Arrests of Transgender Women
 flecheGlobal Treaty to Protect Forced Labor Victims Adopted
 flecheSyria: Strong Evidence Government Used Chemicals as a Weapon
 flecheSnowden Claims NSA Spied on Rights Groups
 flecheExploitation in the Name of Education
 flecheWorld Report 2014: War on Syria’s Civilians Unchecked
 flecheCorée du Nord : Crimes contre l'humanité dans les camps
 flecheWar on Syria’s Civilians Unchecked
 flecheStatement on US President Obama’s surveillance speech
 flecheWorld Bank Group: Inadequate Response to Killings, Land Grabs
 flecheWhy Tech is a Double-edged Sword for Human Rights
 flecheReporters’ Guide For Covering the 2014 Winter Olympic Games in Sochi, Russia
 flecheTunisia: Strengthen New Constitution’s Human Rights Protection
 flecheCentral African Republic: Sectarian Atrocities Escalate
 flecheChallenging the Red Lines
 flecheSaudi Arabia: Activists Challenging Status Quo
 flecheSyria: Holistic Approach Needed for Justice
 flecheICC: Support Justice, Reject Immunity
 flecheICC: Africa Should Reject ‘Free Pass’ for Leaders
 flecheUN: Start International Talks on ‘Killer Robots’
 fleche"At Least Let Them Work"
 flecheRussia: Abuses Tarnish 100-Day Countdown to Winter Olympics
 flechePressure Grows to Protect Domestic Workers
 flecheEU: Improve Migrant Rescue, Offer Refuge
 flecheJordan: Reform Agenda Falling Short
 flecheUN: Hold International Talks on ‘Killer Robots’
 flecheTunisia: Landmark Opportunity to Combat Torture
 fleche“You Can Still See Their Blood”
 flecheSyria: Executions, Hostage Taking by Rebels
 flecheGroundbreaking Treaty on Toxic Mercury
 flecheUN Security Council: Address Rights Abuses in DR Congo
 flecheAfghanistan: Child Marriage, Domestic Violence Harm Progress
 flecheICC: keep pledges to strengthen international justice
 flecheICC: Strengthen international justice at Kampala Conference
 flecheUnited Nations - Do not meet with officials wanted for war crimes - Letter to UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon
 flecheDecisive moment for global transparency effort
 flecheWorld Report: Abusers target Human Rights messengers
 flecheUN: Act to end atrocities in Eastern Congo
 flecheWorld AIDS Day: Punitive laws threaten HIV progress
 flecheICC: Promote global support for Court
 flecheReport "Together, Apart - Organizing around sexual orientation and gender identity worldwide"
 flecheUAE: exploited workers building ‘Island of Happiness’
 flecheSwine flu measures no excuse for abridging rights
 flecheQ & A: International Criminal Court’s decision on al-Bashir’s arrest warrant
 flecheThe intensifying battle over Internet freedom
 fleche2009 World Report: Obama should emphasize human rights
 flecheKillings in Kiwanja - The UN’s inability to protect civilians
 flecheICC: First warrants requested for attacks on Darfur Peacekeepers
 flecheGovernments should improve access to pain treatment : millions worldwide suffer unnecessarily
 flecheICC: Good progress amid missteps in first five years
 flecheOAS adopts resolution to protect sexual rights
 flecheArmenia: civilians die as police suppress demonstrations and riots
 flecheReport : "On the Margins of Profit - Rights at Risk in the Global Economy"
 flecheKosovo: build new state on rule of law
 fleche2007 in photos
 flecheWorld Report 2008
 flecheDemocracy charade undermines rights
 fleche“Burma: children bought and sold by army recruiters”
 flecheHuman Rights Watch’s Statement to the International Organization for Migration (IOM) Council
 flecheBurma: fully cooperate with UN envoy
 flecheNicaragua: New Abortion Ban Puts Women’s Lives at Risk
 flecheRussia targets Georgians for expulsion
 flecheDarfur 2007: Chaos by Design - Report
 flecheDarfur 2007: Chaos by Design - Report

 flecheUganda: Press homophobia raises fears of crackdown
 flecheSpain: Migrant Children at Risk in Government Facilities
 flecheHuman Rights Watch Launches World Report 2007 on Guantanamo Anniversary
 flecheEU Should Fill Leadership Void on Human Rights
 flecheLes pionniers de la justice internationale
 flecheUniversal Jurisdiction in Europe : The State of the Art
 flecheHuman Rights Watch World Report 2006
 flecheUkraine: Migrants, Asylum Seekers Regularly Abused
 flecheHuman Rights Watch Statement on U.S. Secret Detention Facilities in Europe
 flecheD.R. Congo: Arming Civilians Adds Fuel to the Fire
 flecheRussia: Mothers With HIV and Their Children Face Stigma and Discrimination
 flecheSudan: Communal Violence Threatens Peace Process
 flecheBalkans: Srebrenica’s Most Wanted Remain Free
 flecheKyrgyzstan: Say No to Return of Uzbek Refugees
 flecheChina: Religious Repression of Uighur Muslims
 fleche'Diplomatic Assurances' Allowing Torture: Growing Trend Defies International Law

 flecheHuman Rights Watch International Film Festival
 flecheDans toute l'Europe, des organisations de défense des droits humains et des réfugiés demandent à l'Union européenne d'abandonner une proposition déterminante sur le droit d'asile
 flecheRepeating Clinton's Mistakes
 flecheU.S.: Abu Ghraib Only the “Tip of the Iceberg”
 fleche'Diplomatic Assurances' Allowing Torture
 flecheStop the export of U.S.-Funded Abstinence-only HIV/AIDS programs
 flecheCuba: EU Should Insist on Real Rights Progress
 flecheColombia: Armed Groups Send Children to War
 flecheU.S. Gag on Needle Exchange Harms U.N. AIDS Efforts
 flecheSudan: Atrocities, Impunity Threaten Lasting Peace
 flecheHuman Rights Day Statement
 flecheUnited Nations : Good Diagnosis, but Poor Prescription
 flecheIraq: Coalition Ignored Warnings on Weapons Stocks
 flecheBalkans: Local Courts Currently Unprepared to Try War Crimes

 flechePrisoners Who Disappear
 flecheHuman Rights in the War on Terrorism
 flecheOlympic Spotlight Shifts to China : Beijing Should Use Olympic Games to Improve Basic Rights
 flecheIraq: Insurgents Must Stop Targeting Civilians
 flecheU.S.: Hundreds of Civilian Deaths in Iraq Were Preventable
 flecheAfrica: Gender Inequality Fuels AIDS Crisis
 flecheTurkey: Acceleration of Reforms Needed Now for EU Bid
 flecheColombia — Widespread Use of Child Combatants
 flecheAfghanistan: Security Must Precede Repatriation
 flecheTrade Ministers Urged to Protect Labor Rights in FTAA

 flecheFTAA Summit: Reject Tighter Patents on AIDS Drugs
 flecheNAFTA Labor Accord Ineffective
Keywords   go
Translate this page Traduire par Google Translate

Share on Facebook
Partager sur Twitter
Share on Google+Google + Share on LinkedInLinkedIn
Partager sur MessengerMessenger Partager sur BloggerBlogger
Other items
where is published this article: