Ref. :  000033176
Date :  2010-04-14
Language :  English
Home Page / The whole website
fr / es / de / po / en

Development aid rose in 2009 and most donors will meet 2010 aid targets

Author :  OCDE / OECD


New OECD figures show continuing growth in development aid in 2009, despite the financial crisis. Total net official development assistance (ODA) from the donors in the OECD’s Development Assistance Committee (DAC) rose 0.7% in real terms, but the rise was 6.8% once debt relief, a volatile item, is excluded (see tables and charts for 2009). The OECD Secretary General, Angel Gurría, welcomed news of the further increase in ODA and urged donors to keep the momentum going in future years, despite their fiscal challenges. “Aid is less than 1% of government spending on average in OECD countries while there is still much effort needed to reach the Millenium Development Goals. This is a vital investment with big returns for the world as a whole” he observed.

The DAC Chair, Eckhard Deutscher, pointed out that a clear majority of DAC members are meeting their aid commitments even in the face of the economic crisis. Though there has been an encouraging increase in ODA to Africa, Deutscher pointed out that this fell well short of the Gleneagles target of a USD 25 billion increase by 2010. “Aid financing remains vital to meet the MDGs,” he observed, “so all donors need to make the efforts necessary to meet their commitments.”


ODA in 2009

In 2009, total net official development assistance (ODA) from members of the OECD’s Development Assistance Committee (DAC) rose slightly in real terms (+0.7%) to USD 119.6 billion, representing 0.31% of DAC members’ combined gross national income. Debt relief, which had been especially high in 2005 and 2006 due to exceptional Paris Club packages for Iraq and Nigeria, fell sharply. Excluding debt relief, the rise in ODA in real terms was +6.8%.

If debt relief and humanitarian aid are excluded, bilateral aid for development programmes and projects rose by 8.5% in real terms, as donors continued to scale up their core development projects and programmes. Most of the rise was in new lending (+20.6%), but grants also increased (+4.6%, excluding debt relief).

In 2009, net bilateral ODA to Africa was USD 28 billion, representing an increase of 3% in real terms over 2008. USD 25 billion of this aid went to sub-Saharan Africa, an increase of 5.1% over 2008.


Donor performance

In 2009, the largest donors by volume were the United States, France, Germany, the United Kingdom and Japan. Five countries exceeded the United Nations ODA target of 0.7% of GNI: Denmark, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway and Sweden.

The largest percentage increases in net ODA in real terms were from Norway, France, the United Kingdom, Korea (which joined the DAC with effect from 1 January 2010), Finland, Belgium and Switzerland. Significant increases were also recorded in Denmark, Sweden and the United States.

In 2009, the United States was the largest donor providing USD 28.7 billion in net ODA flows, representing an increase of 5.4% in real terms over 2008. Its ODA/GNI ratio rose from 0.19% in 2008 to 0.20% in 2009. Total net US ODA flows increased to each region, particularly to sub-Saharan Africa (+10.5% to USD 7.5 billion). ODA also increased significantly to Afghanistan (+39.5% to USD 3.0 billion). US net ODA to the group of Least Developed Countries (LDCs) increased by +13.6% to USD 8.1 billion.

Japan’s net ODA fell by 10.7% in real terms to USD 9.5 billion, representing 0.18% of its GNI. The fall was mainly due to the fact that debt relief, notably for Iraq, fell compared to 2008. However, contributions to international financial institutions increased significantly in 2009.

The combined net ODA of the fifteen members of the DAC that are EU members fell slightly (-0.2%) to USD 67.1 billion, representing 0.44% of their combined GNI. DAC-EU ODA represented 56% of total DAC ODA.

In real terms, net ODA rose in seven DAC-EU countries as follows:

* Belgium (+11.5%), due to a general scaling up of its aid;
* Denmark (+4.2%);
* Finland (+13.1%), as it increased its bilateral aid;
* France (+16.9%), due to an increase in bilateral lending and contributions to international organisations;
* Luxembourg (+1.9%);
* Sweden (+7.4%), as it continued to achieve an ODA level of 1 % of its GNI;
* United Kingdom (+14.6%), reflecting the scaling up of its bilateral aid.


Aid fell in the following DAC-EU countries:

* Austria (-31.2%), due to reduced levels of debt relief compared with 2008;
* Germany (-12.0%), as reduced debt relief outweighed significant increased bilateral aid;
* Greece (-12%), reflecting tightening ODA budgets due to fiscal pressure;
* Ireland (-18.9%), due to budgetary pressures;
* Italy (-31.1%), due to a decrease in overall aid and reduced debt relief;
* Netherlands (-4.5%);
* Portugal (-15.7%);
* Spain (-1.2%) though significant spending approved late in 2009 will only take effect in 2010, maintaining the increasing trend of its ODA.


Aid by EU institutions rose by 4.4% to USD 15.0 billion, mainly due to an increase in grant programmes.

Net ODA rose or fell in other DAC countries as follows:

* Australia (-1.4%) due to high debt relief levels in 2008 which did not continue into 2009;
* Canada (-9.5%), following a large contribution to IDA in 2008 and a reduction in debt relief ;
* Korea (+13.5%), due to an increase in bilateral loans;
* New Zealand (-3.2%);
* Norway (+17.3%), due to an increase in its bilateral aid;
* Switzerland (+11.5%), due to special debt relief for Togo and increased costs for asylum seekers being counted in its ODA.


Gross ODA (i.e. ODA without subtracting loan repayments) in 2009 amounted to USD 132.7 billion (see table for 2009). The largest donors were: the United States (USD 29.5 billion), Japan (USD 16.5 billion), France (USD 15.3 billion), Germany (USD 13.3 billion) and the United Kingdom (USD 11.7 billion).

The following non-DAC members reported changes in their net ODA in 2009 as follows:

* Czech Republic (-4.7%);
* Hungary (+21.7%), due to an increase in its bilateral programmes;
* Iceland (-11.7%) due to budgetary pressures;
* Poland (+13.2%);
* Slovak Republic (-18.9%), as its bilateral assistance was reduced;
* Turkey (+2.1%).


What are the expected aid levels for 2010?

At the Gleneagles G8 and Millennium +5 summits in 2005, donors made specific commitments to increase their aid. When quantified by the OECD Secretariat, the pledges implied lifting aid from around USD 80 billion in 2004 to nearly USD 130 billion in 2010, at constant 2004 prices, representing 0.36% of estimated GNI in 2010.

On 17 February 2010, the OECD released its first estimate of the 2010 ODA outcome, based on a special review of donors’ budget plans for 2010. This estimate has now been updated in light of the DAC donors’ 2009 performance and some further adjustments to the 2010 targets. In general, GNI reported by DAC donors for 2009 was slightly higher than previously estimated and the GNI prospects for 2010 are also slightly improved.

The OECD now estimates that the recent economic contraction has, by cutting nominal GNI, reduced the dollar value of the commitments made for 2010 to around USD 126 billion (in constant 2004 dollars), or USD 46 billion over the 2004 level, compared with the original estimate of USD 50 billion.

While most countries have maintained their commitments for 2010, others, including some large donors, have reduced or postponed the pledges they made for 2010. On the basis of current 2010 budget proposals and latest GNI figures:

* The overall expected ODA level for 2010 is estimated at USD 108 billion expressed in 2004 dollars, an increase of USD 28 billion over the 2004 baseline, with the ODA/GNI ratio rising over the same period from 0.26% to an estimated 0.32%.
* The shortfall is USD 18 billion (in 2004 dollars) against the 2005 commitments, once the effects of reduced GNI are taken into account; this shortfall impacts particularly on Africa.
* Expressed in 2009 prices, projected 2010 ODA is estimated at USD 126 billion, representing an increase of nearly USD 6 billion over 2009.
* Africa, in particular, is likely to receive only about USD 11 billion of the USD 25 billion increase envisaged at Gleneagles, due mainly to some European donors who give large shares of their official development assistance (ODA) to Africa not meeting their ambitious targets.


2010 is a key year for DAC-EU donors, who in 2005 aimed to reach a collective total of 0.56% of GNI in net ODA for that year, with a minimum country target of 0.51%. 2010 is also special for DAC-EU donors as it represents the midpoint between the 2005 commitments and the 2015 target date for meeting the 0.7% ODA/GNI level.

Some will surpass that goal: Sweden, with the world’s highest ODA as a percentage of its GNI at 1.01%, is followed by Luxembourg (1%), Denmark (0.83%), the Netherlands (0.8%), Belgium (0.7%), the United Kingdom (now estimated at 0.60%), Finland (0.56%), Ireland (0.52%) and Spain (0.51%).

But others are unlikely to reach the target, although some have made significant progress since 2004: France (estimated at between 0.44 and 0.48%, 0.46% is used in the attached projections), Germany (0.40%), Austria (0.37%), Portugal (0.34%), Greece (0.21%), and Italy (0.20%).

Other DAC countries made varying ODA commitments for 2010, and most, but not all, will fulfil them. The United States pledged to double its aid to sub-Saharan Africa between 2004 and 2010 and already attained this goal in 2009. Canada aimed to double its 2001 International Assistance Envelope level by 2010 in nominal terms, Australia aimed to reach $A 4 billion, and New Zealand planned to reach 0.28% of its GNI.

These three countries all appear on track to meet these objectives, and Australia and New Zealand have since set further targets for later years. Norway will maintain its ODA level of 1% of its GNI, and Switzerland will likely reach 0.47% of its GNI, exceeding its previous commitment of 0.41%.

Japan’s Gleneagles promise was to give USD 10 billion more over the period 2005 to 2009 than if its ODA had stayed at its 2004 level over this period. It fell short by USD 3.6 billion due mainly to severe economic and budgetary constraints, as well as significant early repayments on ODA loans by some borrowing countries. For 2010, Japan aims to increase its ODA, although since the exact level is not yet known the projections below use the 2009 figure for the time being.

Despite various shortfalls against commitments, ODA increased by nearly 30% in real terms between 2004 and 2009, and is expected to rise by about 36% in real terms between 2004 and 2010. ODA as a percentage of GNI rose from 0.26% in 2004 to 0.31% in 2009 and is expected to rise to 0.32% in 2010. This is the largest volume increase ever in ODA over such a period and does not depend on the large increase in debt relief which boosted the aid numbers in 2005-07. The continued growth in ODA has shown that aid pledges are effective when backed up with adequate resources, political will and firm multi-year spending plans. ODA will continue to rise in 2010, unlike other financial flows to developing countries which have fallen sharply since the onset of the global financial crisis.

See:

>> DAC Member's Commitments and Performance: Summary Tables of OECD Secretariat Projections
>> DAC member's net ODA 1990 - 2009 and DAC Secretariat Simulations of net ODA to 2010.
>> Online dynamic graphics: Net ODA - ODA/GNI in 2009


- For more information, please contact Helen Fisher by email: Helen.Fisher@oecd.org or by telephone: +331 45 24 80 97.


Rate this content
 
 
 
Average of 84 ratings 
Rating 2.52 / 4 MoyenMoyenMoyenMoyen
Same author:
 flecheObesity Update 2017
 flecheHow’s life?
 flecheBetter international co-ordination could lead to more worldwide benefits from migration
 flecheSingapore tops latest OECD PISA global education survey
 flecheCities will become inequality traps without better housing, transport policies
 flecheGrowing risk of social exclusion among early school leavers
 flecheThe Economic Consequences of Outdoor Air Pollution
 flecheCompare your country: International Migration
 flecheOECD International Migration Outlook 2016
 flecheGovernments must address anti-immigration backlash
 flecheAfrican Economic Outlook 2016
 flecheEnvironmental performance review of France 2016: France will need further effort to meet environmental goals
 flecheOECD Economic outlook
 flecheGlobal economy stuck in low-growth trap: Policymakers need to act to keep promises, OECD says in latest Economic Outlook
 flecheLending to SMEs and entrepreneurs is improving, but more diverse forms of financing are needed
 flecheWorld imports of fake goods worth nearly half a trillion USD a year
 flecheOECD study finds Britons will be paying a heavy “Brexit tax” for many years if UK leaves EU
 flecheDevelopment aid rises again in 2015, spending on refugees doubles
 flecheOECD countries confirm their drive to improve gender equality in public leadership
 flecheFlux de cocaïne
 flecheNew data show importance of quality as well as quantity of jobs and how both evolved during crisis
 flechePolitical finance needs tighter regulation and enforcement
 flecheA boost to transparency in international tax matters: 31 countries sign tax co-operation agreement to enable automatic sharing of country by country information
 flecheFurther reforms needed to tackle growing risk of pensioner poverty
 flecheSpain’s future prosperity depends on raising skill levels and removing barriers to employment
 flecheCountries should address disruptive effects of the digital economy
 flecheDiscrimination and poor job prospects hit children of immigrants
 flecheMore than 3 million German emigrants in OECD countries
 flecheAction is needed to secure future livelihoods in developed and emerging economies, says the OECD Development Centre
 flecheLow oil prices and monetary easing triggering modest acceleration of global recovery
 flecheEarly gender gaps drive career choices and employment opportunities
 flecheShifts in migration underline need for policy reform, says OECD
 flecheAsia/Pacific countries need to improve affordable access to healthcare, says OECD
 flecheComprehensive action needed to shift the global economy into higher gear, says OECD in latest Economic Outlook
 flechePoorer regions struggling to catch up in advanced economies, says OECD
 flecheEmployment
 flecheOECD releases first BEPS recommendations to G20 for international approach to combat tax avoidance by multinationals
 flecheProgress made but Chile should better detect and thoroughly investigate foreign bribery, says OECD
 flecheAmbitious structural reforms can pave the return to strong and sustainable growth, OECD says
 flecheEmployment situation, third quarter 2013, OECD
 flecheLatin America: Tax revenues continue to rise, but are low and varied among countries, according to new OECD-ECLAC-CIAT report
 flecheAsian countries top OECD’s latest PISA survey on state of global education
 flecheOECD Employment Outlook
 flecheGlobal economy advancing but pace of recovery varies, says OECD Economic Outlook
 flecheGlobal economy is improving but Europe lags behind, says OECD
 flecheGlobal portal on product recalls
 flecheInternet firms driving information technology industry growth, says OECD
 flecheInternational Economic Forum on Africa (4 October 2012, Paris - France)
 flecheAgriculture: Increased productivity and a more sustainable food system will improve global food security OECD and FAO publish new Agricultural Outlook
 flecheEconomy: migration starting to rebound, says OECD
 flecheCreate Your Better Life Index
 flecheGrowth in health spending grinds to a halt
 flecheTowards Green Growth: Monitoring Progress - OECD Indicators
 flecheWater: Balancing demand
 flecheReducing inequality while boosting economic growth is possible, says OECD
 flecheEconomy: Global shocks to become more frequent, says OECD
 flecheEnvironment: Green and growth go together
 flecheKorea and Finland top OECD’s latest PISA survey of education performance
 flecheEnvironmental taxation can spur innovation, says OECD
 flecheHealth: OECD says governments must fight fat
 flecheOECD iLibrary: New platform delivers integrated access to OECD’s knowledge base
 flecheEconomy: Recovery slowing amid increased uncertainty, says interim economic assessment
 flecheDeveloping countries set to account for nearly 60% of world GDP by 2030, according to new estimates
 flecheEconomy : G20 keeps investment flows open, but continued vigilance needed, say OECD, UNCTAD
 flecheWater: The right price can encourage efficiency and investment
 flecheDonors’ mixed aid performance for 2010 sparks concern
 flecheSqueeze on public budgets boosting e-government, says OECD
 flecheGurría calls for ‘new generation’ of statistics to reinforce public confidence in government
 flecheOECD welcomes experts’ call on need for new measures of social progress
 flecheOECD Global Forum consolidates tax evasion revolution in advance of Pittsburgh
 flecheKeep doors open to migrant workers to meet long-term labour needs, says OECD
 flecheOECD Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS)
 flecheDevelopment Aid at its highest level ever in 2008
 fleche10th OECD forum (23-24 june 2009, Paris)
 flecheCrisis is an opportunity to revive trade reforms, says OECD report
 flecheRebalancing the world Economy: OECD development co-operation report 2009
 flecheOECD composite leading indicators fall to lowest levels since 1970s
 flecheIncome inequality and poverty rising in most OECD countries
 flecheFinancial centres become more transparent, but information exchange remains a problem for some
 flecheTailor immigration policies to future needs, says OECD
 flecheBiofuel policies in OECD countries costly and ineffective, says report
 flecheLabour market discrimination still a big problem in OECD countries
 flecheFarm policy reform urgent amid rising world food prices
 flecheOECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2008-2017 - Highlights
 flecheOECD countries stay open to commercial investments by sovereign wealth funds
 flecheDebt Relief is down: other ODA rises slightly
 flecheOECD Environmental Outlook to 2030 - Summary
 fleche2008 OECD Environmental Outlook - How much will it cost to address today's key environmental problems?
 flecheHelping immigrants integrate better into society must become a priority, says OECD Secretary-General
 flecheGovernments must do more to help workers adapt to new global economy, says OECD
 flecheOECD Employment Outlook - 2007 Edition - Summary
 flecheOECD Employment Outlook 2007 - Statistical Annex
 flecheIntergenerational Transmission of Disadvantage: Mobility or Immobility across Generations? A Review of the Evidence for OECD Countries
 flecheInternational migration to OECD countries continues to grow in response to labour needs
 flecheReport "Giving Knowledge for Free: The Emergence of Open Educational Resources"
 flecheOpen Educational Resources bring new opportunities, challenges
 flecheOECD annual ministerial meeting to discuss globalisation, innovation and trade (Paris on 15-16 May 2007)
 flecheOECD warns against reform complacency as new report highlights priorities for action
 flecheThe Euro area - will the recovery last?
 flecheOECD Global Forum on International Investment “Enhancing the investment climate: the case of infrastructure”
 flecheMore OECD countries focusing on early childhood as key to education success
 flecheThe Gender, Institutions and Development Data Base
 flecheOECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook - 2006-2015
 flecheAfrican Economic Outlook 2005/2006: Economic prospects improve in much of Africa, though transportation remains a problem
 flecheOECD Forum 2006 : "Balacing Globalisation" (Paris, 22-23 May 2006)
 flecheL’OCDE incite les pouvoirs publics et l’industrie à intensifier la lutte contre le spam
 flecheMinisters look to integrate environment protection with development aid 3 - 5 April at OECD headquarters
 flecheLes élèves qui maîtrisent l’informatique obtiennent de meilleurs scores à l'école
 flecheOECD Handbook on Economic Globalisation Indicators
 flecheConference on the future digital economy: digital content creation, distribution and access (30-31 January 2006, Rome - Italy)
 flecheOECD and the WTO Hong Kong Ministerial Conference
 flecheLess robust than meets the eye?
 flecheOECD urges freer trade combined with structural adjustment to reap benefits from globalisation
 flecheGlobal scientific research project launched to improve understanding of the human brain
 flecheEconomic Survey of the Euro Area 2005
 flecheOECD countries warn of continuing shortfalls in insurance coverage against terrorism
 flecheOECD urges governments to work with social partners on teacher policy
 flecheOECD urges more dynamic employment policies as response to globalisation
 flecheAgriculture export competition will intensify, with rising share of trade by developing countries
 flecheHigh-Level Meeting of the OECD Committee for Agriculture, 14-15 June 2005 - Chair Franz Fischler's Summary
 flecheBrazil, China, India and South Africa to tackle food and agriculture challenges with OECD
 flecheOECD Ministerial Council Meeting, 3-4 May 2005, Chair’s Summary
 flecheOECD environmental performance review of France - A positive but demanding assessment
 flecheCentral Asia since 1991 - The Experience of the New Independent States
 flecheLand, Violent Conflict and Development
 flecheThe Impact of Social Institutions on the Economic Role of Women in Developing Countries
 flecheLa condition des femmes en Inde, Kenya, Soudan et Tunisie
 flecheDecentralisation and Poverty in Developing Countries: Exploring the Impact
 flecheData base on immigrants and expatriates
 flecheDonnées environnementales
 flecheStructure and Trends in International Trade in Services
 flecheWorld trade / 2002- 2004
 flecheOECD Releases New GDP Comparisons Based on 2002 Purchasing Power Parities
 flecheJohnston, Donald J.
 flecheOECD Governments, Insurers Clarify the Definition of Terrorism for Insurance Purposes
 flecheCT Access now Widespread but Laggard Users Risk New Digital Divide, Warns OECD
 flechePISA 2003
 flecheTop-performer Finland improves further in PISA survey as gap between countries widens
 flecheBhagwati, Jagdish
 flecheTruly global
 flecheOECD's Environmental Performance Review of Sweden
 flecheOECD International Trade Statistics - Trends in Second Quarter 2004
 flecheEducation Levels Rising in OECD Countries but Low Attainment Still Hampers Some
 flecheOECD Economic Outlook - may 2004
 flecheAnalyse des politiques d'éducation
 flecheOECD Task Force to Coordinate Fight against Spam
 flecheFrance Needs More Regulatory Reform to Strengthen its Economy, Says OECD
 flecheOECD Countries are not on Track to Meet their Environmental Commitments
 flecheEnvironment Ministers to Meet at OECD 19-21 April 2004
 flecheOECD Backs Broadband for Economic and Social Development
 flecheActivites de lutte contre la corruption en Europe de l'Est et central
 flecheScience, Technology and Innovation for the 21st Century. Meeting of the OECD Committee for Scientific and Technological Policy at Ministerial Level, 29-30 January 2004
 flecheDeclaration by the Heads of the IMF, OECD and World Bank
 flecheOECD Report Warns of Growing Risk of Teacher Shortages in OECD Countries
 flecheCompetition in the spotlight
 flecheL'OCDE incite les gouvernements à rendre leurs systèmes fiscaux plus efficaces
13
SEARCH
Keywords   go
in 
Translate this page Traduire par Google Translate
Share

Share on Facebook
FACEBOOK
Partager sur Twitter
TWITTER
Share on Google+Google + Share on LinkedInLinkedIn
Partager sur MessengerMessenger Partager sur BloggerBlogger