Ref. :  000031445
Date :  2009-03-30
Language :  English
Home Page / The whole website
fr / es / de / po / en

Development Aid at its highest level ever in 2008

Author :  OCDE / OECD


Keywords : 


In 2008, total net official development assistance (ODA) from members of the OECD’s Development Assistance Committee (DAC) rose by 10.2% in real terms to USD 119.8 billion. This is the highest dollar figure ever recorded. It represents 0.30% of members’ combined gross national income (GNI, see Table 1 and Chart 1).

Bilateral development projects and programmes have been on a rising trend in recent years; however, they rose significantly by 12.5% in real terms in 2008 compared to 2007, indicating that donors are substantially scaling up their core aid programmes (see Chart 2).

In 2008, preliminary data show that net bilateral ODA from DAC donors to Africa totalled USD 26 billion, of which USD 22.5 billion went to sub-Saharan Africa. Excluding volatile debt relief grants, bilateral aid to Africa and sub-Saharan Africa rose by 10.6% and 10% respectively in real terms. (The increases including debt relief were 1.2% and 0.4% respectively).

Donor Performance

The largest donors in 2008, by volume, were the United States, Germany, the United Kingdom, France and Japan. Five countries exceeded the United Nations target of 0.7% of GNI: Denmark, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway and Sweden.

The largest volume increases came from the United States, the United Kingdom, Spain, Germany, Japan and Canada. In addition, significant increases were recorded in Australia, Belgium, Greece, New Zealand and Portugal.

In 2008, net ODA by the United States was USD 26 billion, representing an increase of 16.8% in real terms. Its ODA/GNI ratio rose from 0.16% in 2007 to 0.18% in 2008. The United States’ net ODA levels increased to practically all regions, particularly sub-Saharan Africa (+38.3% in real terms to USD 6.5 billion). Net ODA also increased substantially to the group of Least Developed Countries (+40.5% in real terms to USD 6.9 billion), and humanitarian aid also rose significantly (+42.5% in real terms to USD 4.4 billion) due mainly to increased relief food aid.

Japan’s net ODA was USD 9.4 billion, representing an increase of 8.2% in real terms over 2007. Its net ODA/GNI ratio rose from 0.17% in 2007 to 0.18% in 2008. The increase is mainly due to a rise in contributions to international financial institutions. This reverses the downward trend in Japan’s ODA since 2000 (excluding peaks in 2005 and 2006 due to high levels of debt relief).

The combined net ODA of the fifteen members of the DAC that are EU members rose by 8.6% in real terms to USD 70.2 billion, representing 59% of all DAC ODA. As a share of GNI, net ODA from DAC-EU members rose to 0.42%.

In real terms, net ODA rose in fourteen DAC-EU countries as follows:

*
Belgium (+13.4%), due to an increase in bilateral aid as well as contributions to multilateral organisations;
*
Denmark (+0.3%), practically unchanged;
*
Finland (+6.7%), due to the general scaling up of its aid;
*
France (+2.9%), as it increased its contributions to the EC and bilateral lending;
*
Germany (+5.7%), due to an increase in bilateral co-operation and larger contributions to the EC;
*
Greece (+26.9%), due to an increase in bilateral aid, notably to Africa, as well as multilateral contributions to the EC and IDA;
*
Ireland (+6.4%), reflecting a general scaling up of its aid in order to reach the UN target of 0.7% by 2012;
*
Italy (+2.2%) due to increased debt relief;
*
Luxembourg (+1.8%), reflecting an increase in bilateral aid;
*
Netherlands (+4.8%), as it increased its bilateral aid;
*
Portugal (+ 21.1%), due to an increase in bilateral aid, notably to Africa;
*
Spain (+19.4%), reflecting increased bilateral aid, especially to Africa, as well as larger contributions to multilateral institutions;
*
Sweden (+3.9%), Sweden budgets for an ODA level of 1% of GNI, but fell short this year, partly because expected debt relief did not materialise;
*
United Kingdom (+24.1%), reflecting a general scaling up of its aid.

Net ODA fell in Austria (-14.0%), due to a lower level of debt relief grants provided in 2008 compared to 2007.

Net ODA by the European Commission rose by 6.8% in real terms to USD 13.4 billion, mainly due to an increase in technical cooperation activities and humanitarian aid.

Net ODA from other DAC countries rose or fell between 2007 and 2008 as follows:

*
Australia (+13.8%), reflecting an overall scaling up of its aid;
*
Canada (+12.2%), due to an overall scaling up of its aid and increased contributions to the World Bank;
*
New Zealand (+11.0%), reflecting an increase in bilateral ODA;
*
Norway (-2.4%);
*
Switzerland (+6.5%), as it increased its bilateral aid.

On a gross basis (i.e. without any deductions for loan repayments), ODA reached USD 133.9 billion in 2008, reflecting an increase of 9.1% in real terms. The largest donors of gross ODA were the United States (USD 26.9 billion), Japan (USD 17.4 billion), Germany (USD 15.9 billion), France (USD 12.4 billion) and the United Kingdom (USD 11.8 billion) (see Table 3).

Amongst the non-DAC members, the following donors reported changes in net ODA in 2008 as follows:

*
Czech Republic (-0.4%);
*
Hungary (-7.4%);
*
Korea (+31.5%), which plans to become a member of the DAC in 2010, increased its ODA mainly through larger contributions to regional development banks and funds;
*
Poland (-9.0%), as debt relief fell;
*
Slovak Republic (+14.4%).

Aid commitments within reach?

In 2005, donors committed to increase their aid at the Gleneagles G8 and UN Millennium +5 summits. The pledges made at these summits, combined with other commitments, implied lifting aid from USD 80 billion in 2004 to USD 130 billion in 2010, at constant 2004 prices.

While a few countries have slightly reduced their targets since 2005, the bulk of these commitments remain in force. However, reduced growth in 2008 and the prospect of economic contraction in 2009 reduces the dollar value of commitments expressed as a percentage of national income.

Overall, the current commitments imply an ODA level of USD 121 billion in 2010, expressed in 2004 dollars, or an increase of USD 20 billion from the 2008 level (see Chart 3). Table 4 shows these commitments in 2008 dollars.

Some further increases in aid can be expected. A new survey of donors’ forward spending plans suggests an 11% increase in programmed aid between 2008 and 2010, including larger disbursements by some multilateral agencies. Debt relief may also increase slightly as the debt of the remaining Heavily Indebted Poor Countries is treated in the Paris Club.

However, the current outlook suggests that at least USD 10-15 billion must still be added to current forward spending plans if donors are to meet their current 2010 commitments.

The 2008 ODA data as well as forward spending plans suggest that with some further effort, most donors are within reach of their 2010 targets. The countries that have already met the UN ODA target of 0.7% of GNI are expected to continue to do so.

Most other DAC members are expected to meet, or nearly meet, their 2010 targets. However, there are likely to be large shortfalls in a few countries. For example, ODA in 2008 from Austria, Italy and Greece, excluding debt relief, is well under half their ODA/GNI target for 2010.

Only a special crisis-related effort can ensure that the 2010 targets for aid are met, which is even more important now that the economic crisis is reducing developing countries’ growth prospects and their ability to make progress towards the Millennium Development Goals.

The need for aid to counter the development impact of the crisis

The current global financial crisis is having a serious impact on low income countries. World trade is experiencing its largest decline since 1929 and commodity prices, particularly for the exports of low income countries, are falling.

Foreign direct investment and other private flows are on the decline, and remittances are expected to drop significantly in 2009. Budgets of many developing countries were hit hard by the rises in food and oil prices in the last two years. Many countries are not in a strong fiscal position to address the current financial crisis.

Whilst the full effects and duration of the financial crisis are still to be seen, it is important for aid to play a countercyclical role to help balance the sharp reversal in overall flows to developing countries.

ODA has played a positive countercyclical role during some previous financial crises. After the Mexican debt crisis in 1982, commercial lending was significantly reduced for about a decade, yet ODA rose slightly during this period, playing a strong role in maintaining flows to Latin America.

However the global economic recession in the early 1990s produced large fiscal deficits in donor countries that led to deep cuts in ODA, which fell from 0.33 per cent of gross national income in 1992 to 0.22 per cent in 1997.

Aid cuts at this point in time would place a dangerous additional burden on developing countries already faced with restricted sources of income and increased poverty, and perhaps undo some of the progress already made towards meeting the Millennium Development Goals.

At the end of 2008, the OECD Secretary General, Angel Gurría, and the Chair of the DAC, Eckhard Deutscher, launched an Aid Pledge inviting DAC members to reaffirm their aid commitments, and DAC members did confirm these commitments at the OECD in November. The World Bank and IMF have more recently launched new calls for increased aid funding.

Ensuring that aid acts as a countercyclical force will require strong political priority and coordination at the global and country level. Participants of the DAC High Level Meeting will meet at the end of May to discuss the effects of the financial crisis on development in 2009 and thereafter, and how to create and support initiatives to support developing countries during the crisis.


- For more information please contact Yasmin Ahmad, email DAC.Contact@oecd.org tel: + 33 145248903 or visit www.oecd.org/dac

- For more infomration, you can access all the tables and charts.


Rate this content
 
 
 
Average of 39 ratings 
Rating 2.31 / 4 MoyenMoyenMoyenMoyen
Same author:
 flecheObesity Update 2017
 flecheHow’s life?
 flecheBetter international co-ordination could lead to more worldwide benefits from migration
 flecheSingapore tops latest OECD PISA global education survey
 flecheCities will become inequality traps without better housing, transport policies
 flecheGrowing risk of social exclusion among early school leavers
 flecheThe Economic Consequences of Outdoor Air Pollution
 flecheCompare your country: International Migration
 flecheOECD International Migration Outlook 2016
 flecheGovernments must address anti-immigration backlash
 flecheAfrican Economic Outlook 2016
 flecheEnvironmental performance review of France 2016: France will need further effort to meet environmental goals
 flecheOECD Economic outlook
 flecheGlobal economy stuck in low-growth trap: Policymakers need to act to keep promises, OECD says in latest Economic Outlook
 flecheLending to SMEs and entrepreneurs is improving, but more diverse forms of financing are needed
 flecheWorld imports of fake goods worth nearly half a trillion USD a year
 flecheOECD study finds Britons will be paying a heavy “Brexit tax” for many years if UK leaves EU
 flecheDevelopment aid rises again in 2015, spending on refugees doubles
 flecheOECD countries confirm their drive to improve gender equality in public leadership
 flecheFlux de cocaïne
 flecheNew data show importance of quality as well as quantity of jobs and how both evolved during crisis
 flechePolitical finance needs tighter regulation and enforcement
 flecheA boost to transparency in international tax matters: 31 countries sign tax co-operation agreement to enable automatic sharing of country by country information
 flecheFurther reforms needed to tackle growing risk of pensioner poverty
 flecheSpain’s future prosperity depends on raising skill levels and removing barriers to employment
 flecheCountries should address disruptive effects of the digital economy
 flecheDiscrimination and poor job prospects hit children of immigrants
 flecheMore than 3 million German emigrants in OECD countries
 flecheAction is needed to secure future livelihoods in developed and emerging economies, says the OECD Development Centre
 flecheLow oil prices and monetary easing triggering modest acceleration of global recovery
 flecheEarly gender gaps drive career choices and employment opportunities
 flecheShifts in migration underline need for policy reform, says OECD
 flecheAsia/Pacific countries need to improve affordable access to healthcare, says OECD
 flecheComprehensive action needed to shift the global economy into higher gear, says OECD in latest Economic Outlook
 flechePoorer regions struggling to catch up in advanced economies, says OECD
 flecheEmployment
 flecheOECD releases first BEPS recommendations to G20 for international approach to combat tax avoidance by multinationals
 flecheProgress made but Chile should better detect and thoroughly investigate foreign bribery, says OECD
 flecheAmbitious structural reforms can pave the return to strong and sustainable growth, OECD says
 flecheEmployment situation, third quarter 2013, OECD
 flecheLatin America: Tax revenues continue to rise, but are low and varied among countries, according to new OECD-ECLAC-CIAT report
 flecheAsian countries top OECD’s latest PISA survey on state of global education
 flecheOECD Employment Outlook
 flecheGlobal economy advancing but pace of recovery varies, says OECD Economic Outlook
 flecheGlobal economy is improving but Europe lags behind, says OECD
 flecheGlobal portal on product recalls
 flecheInternet firms driving information technology industry growth, says OECD
 flecheInternational Economic Forum on Africa (4 October 2012, Paris - France)
 flecheAgriculture: Increased productivity and a more sustainable food system will improve global food security OECD and FAO publish new Agricultural Outlook
 flecheEconomy: migration starting to rebound, says OECD
 flecheCreate Your Better Life Index
 flecheGrowth in health spending grinds to a halt
 flecheTowards Green Growth: Monitoring Progress - OECD Indicators
 flecheWater: Balancing demand
 flecheReducing inequality while boosting economic growth is possible, says OECD
 flecheEconomy: Global shocks to become more frequent, says OECD
 flecheEnvironment: Green and growth go together
 flecheKorea and Finland top OECD’s latest PISA survey of education performance
 flecheEnvironmental taxation can spur innovation, says OECD
 flecheHealth: OECD says governments must fight fat
 flecheOECD iLibrary: New platform delivers integrated access to OECD’s knowledge base
 flecheEconomy: Recovery slowing amid increased uncertainty, says interim economic assessment
 flecheDeveloping countries set to account for nearly 60% of world GDP by 2030, according to new estimates
 flecheEconomy : G20 keeps investment flows open, but continued vigilance needed, say OECD, UNCTAD
 flecheDevelopment aid rose in 2009 and most donors will meet 2010 aid targets
 flecheWater: The right price can encourage efficiency and investment
 flecheDonors’ mixed aid performance for 2010 sparks concern
 flecheSqueeze on public budgets boosting e-government, says OECD
 flecheGurría calls for ‘new generation’ of statistics to reinforce public confidence in government
 flecheOECD welcomes experts’ call on need for new measures of social progress
 flecheOECD Global Forum consolidates tax evasion revolution in advance of Pittsburgh
 flecheKeep doors open to migrant workers to meet long-term labour needs, says OECD
 flecheOECD Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS)
 fleche10th OECD forum (23-24 june 2009, Paris)
 flecheCrisis is an opportunity to revive trade reforms, says OECD report
 flecheRebalancing the world Economy: OECD development co-operation report 2009
 flecheOECD composite leading indicators fall to lowest levels since 1970s
 flecheIncome inequality and poverty rising in most OECD countries
 flecheFinancial centres become more transparent, but information exchange remains a problem for some
 flecheTailor immigration policies to future needs, says OECD
 flecheBiofuel policies in OECD countries costly and ineffective, says report
 flecheLabour market discrimination still a big problem in OECD countries
 flecheFarm policy reform urgent amid rising world food prices
 flecheOECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2008-2017 - Highlights
 flecheOECD countries stay open to commercial investments by sovereign wealth funds
 flecheDebt Relief is down: other ODA rises slightly
 flecheOECD Environmental Outlook to 2030 - Summary
 fleche2008 OECD Environmental Outlook - How much will it cost to address today's key environmental problems?
 flecheHelping immigrants integrate better into society must become a priority, says OECD Secretary-General
 flecheGovernments must do more to help workers adapt to new global economy, says OECD
 flecheOECD Employment Outlook - 2007 Edition - Summary
 flecheOECD Employment Outlook 2007 - Statistical Annex
 flecheIntergenerational Transmission of Disadvantage: Mobility or Immobility across Generations? A Review of the Evidence for OECD Countries
 flecheInternational migration to OECD countries continues to grow in response to labour needs
 flecheReport "Giving Knowledge for Free: The Emergence of Open Educational Resources"
 flecheOpen Educational Resources bring new opportunities, challenges
 flecheOECD annual ministerial meeting to discuss globalisation, innovation and trade (Paris on 15-16 May 2007)
 flecheOECD warns against reform complacency as new report highlights priorities for action
 flecheThe Euro area - will the recovery last?
 flecheOECD Global Forum on International Investment “Enhancing the investment climate: the case of infrastructure”
 flecheMore OECD countries focusing on early childhood as key to education success
 flecheThe Gender, Institutions and Development Data Base
 flecheOECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook - 2006-2015
 flecheAfrican Economic Outlook 2005/2006: Economic prospects improve in much of Africa, though transportation remains a problem
 flecheOECD Forum 2006 : "Balacing Globalisation" (Paris, 22-23 May 2006)
 flecheL’OCDE incite les pouvoirs publics et l’industrie à intensifier la lutte contre le spam
 flecheMinisters look to integrate environment protection with development aid 3 - 5 April at OECD headquarters
 flecheLes élèves qui maîtrisent l’informatique obtiennent de meilleurs scores à l'école
 flecheOECD Handbook on Economic Globalisation Indicators
 flecheConference on the future digital economy: digital content creation, distribution and access (30-31 January 2006, Rome - Italy)
 flecheOECD and the WTO Hong Kong Ministerial Conference
 flecheLess robust than meets the eye?
 flecheOECD urges freer trade combined with structural adjustment to reap benefits from globalisation
 flecheGlobal scientific research project launched to improve understanding of the human brain
 flecheEconomic Survey of the Euro Area 2005
 flecheOECD countries warn of continuing shortfalls in insurance coverage against terrorism
 flecheOECD urges governments to work with social partners on teacher policy
 flecheOECD urges more dynamic employment policies as response to globalisation
 flecheAgriculture export competition will intensify, with rising share of trade by developing countries
 flecheHigh-Level Meeting of the OECD Committee for Agriculture, 14-15 June 2005 - Chair Franz Fischler's Summary
 flecheBrazil, China, India and South Africa to tackle food and agriculture challenges with OECD
 flecheOECD Ministerial Council Meeting, 3-4 May 2005, Chair’s Summary
 flecheOECD environmental performance review of France - A positive but demanding assessment
 flecheCentral Asia since 1991 - The Experience of the New Independent States
 flecheLand, Violent Conflict and Development
 flecheThe Impact of Social Institutions on the Economic Role of Women in Developing Countries
 flecheLa condition des femmes en Inde, Kenya, Soudan et Tunisie
 flecheDecentralisation and Poverty in Developing Countries: Exploring the Impact
 flecheData base on immigrants and expatriates
 flecheDonnées environnementales
 flecheStructure and Trends in International Trade in Services
 flecheWorld trade / 2002- 2004
 flecheOECD Releases New GDP Comparisons Based on 2002 Purchasing Power Parities
 flecheJohnston, Donald J.
 flecheOECD Governments, Insurers Clarify the Definition of Terrorism for Insurance Purposes
 flecheCT Access now Widespread but Laggard Users Risk New Digital Divide, Warns OECD
 flechePISA 2003
 flecheTop-performer Finland improves further in PISA survey as gap between countries widens
 flecheBhagwati, Jagdish
 flecheTruly global
 flecheOECD's Environmental Performance Review of Sweden
 flecheOECD International Trade Statistics - Trends in Second Quarter 2004
 flecheEducation Levels Rising in OECD Countries but Low Attainment Still Hampers Some
 flecheOECD Economic Outlook - may 2004
 flecheAnalyse des politiques d'éducation
 flecheOECD Task Force to Coordinate Fight against Spam
 flecheFrance Needs More Regulatory Reform to Strengthen its Economy, Says OECD
 flecheOECD Countries are not on Track to Meet their Environmental Commitments
 flecheEnvironment Ministers to Meet at OECD 19-21 April 2004
 flecheOECD Backs Broadband for Economic and Social Development
 flecheActivites de lutte contre la corruption en Europe de l'Est et central
 flecheScience, Technology and Innovation for the 21st Century. Meeting of the OECD Committee for Scientific and Technological Policy at Ministerial Level, 29-30 January 2004
 flecheDeclaration by the Heads of the IMF, OECD and World Bank
 flecheOECD Report Warns of Growing Risk of Teacher Shortages in OECD Countries
 flecheCompetition in the spotlight
 flecheL'OCDE incite les gouvernements à rendre leurs systèmes fiscaux plus efficaces
13
SEARCH
Keywords   go
in